Historical infinitesimalists and modern historiography of infinitesimals Full article
| Journal |
Antiquitates mathematicae
ISSN: 2353-8813 , E-ISSN: 1898-5203 |
||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Output data | Year: 2022, Volume: 16, Pages: 189-257 Pages count : 69 DOI: 10.14708/am.v16i1.7169 | ||||||||||||||||
| Tags | infinitesimals; determinacy; contingency; Leibniz; Cauchy | ||||||||||||||||
| Authors |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Affiliations |
|
Abstract:
Abstract. In the history of infinitesimal calculus, we trace innovation from Leibniz to Cauchy and reaction from Berkeley to Mansion and beyond. We explore 19th century infinitesimal lores, including the approaches of Sim ́eon-Denis Poisson, Gaspard-Gustave de Coriolis, and Jean-Nicolas No ̈el. We examine contrasting historiographic approaches to such lores, in the work of Laugwitz, Schubring, Spalt, and others, and address a recent critique by Archibald et al. We argue that the element of contingency in this history is more prominent than many modern historians seem willing to acknowledge
Cite:
Bair J.
, Borovik A.
, Kanovei V.
, Katz M.
, Kutateladze S.
, Sanders S.
, Sherry D.
, Ugaglia M.
Historical infinitesimalists and modern historiography of infinitesimals
Antiquitates mathematicae. 2022. V.16. P.189-257. DOI: 10.14708/am.v16i1.7169 РИНЦ OpenAlex
Historical infinitesimalists and modern historiography of infinitesimals
Antiquitates mathematicae. 2022. V.16. P.189-257. DOI: 10.14708/am.v16i1.7169 РИНЦ OpenAlex
Dates:
| Submitted: | Dec 12, 2022 |
| Accepted: | Jan 10, 2023 |
| Published print: | Apr 4, 2023 |
| Published online: | Apr 4, 2023 |
Identifiers:
| ≡ Elibrary: | 61770930 |
| ≡ OpenAlex: | W4327531688 |