When Q-Learning fails: unstable behavior for infinite state spaces Full article
| Journal |
ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
ISSN: 1557-9484 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Output data | Year: 2026, Volume: 53, Number: 4, Pages: 79--83 Pages count : 5 | ||||
| Authors |
|
||||
| Affiliations |
|
Abstract:
The Q-learning algorithm is well known for its convergence guarantees to the optimal policy in finite-state environments. In this paper, we investigate its limitations in countable infinite state spaces – a setting common in real-world problems. To this end, we introduce a simple queueing model, based on a load balancing problem, with a countably infinite state space. In this model, a dispatcher assigns incoming jobs to one of two queues by choosing between two possible actions: ''red'' and ''green''. The ''red'' action leads to transient behavior, whereas the ''green'' action ensures stability. Our main result shows that, under certain parameter conditions, Q-learning exhibits instability and fails to converge to the optimal policy. Our findings reveal a critical gap in the theoretical understanding of model-free Reinforcement Learning methods in infinite domains. Numerical experiments illustrate that the transience also occurs …
Cite:
Ayesta U.
, Foss S.
, Jonckheere M.
, Puricellia V.
When Q-Learning fails: unstable behavior for infinite state spaces
ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review. 2026. V.53. N4. P.79--83.
When Q-Learning fails: unstable behavior for infinite state spaces
ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review. 2026. V.53. N4. P.79--83.
Dates:
| Published print: | Mar 31, 2026 |
Identifiers:
No identifiers